<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing The Shack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edcottrell.com/2008/02/26/marketing-the-shack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edcottrell.com/2008/02/26/marketing-the-shack/</link>
	<description>musings of a conservative Texas attorney-to-be on law, faith, politics, technology, and life</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: More Thoughts on The Shack &#124; Ed Cottrell</title>
		<link>http://www.edcottrell.com/2008/02/26/marketing-the-shack/#comment-94653</link>
		<dc:creator>More Thoughts on The Shack &#124; Ed Cottrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edcottrell.com/2008/02/26/marketing-the-shack/#comment-94653</guid>
		<description>[...] comprises eighteen chapters, a foreword, &#8220;After Words,&#8221; acknowledgments, and a plug for The Missy Project. I think it&#8217;s unfair to an author and to the reader to write a review based on anything less [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comprises eighteen chapters, a foreword, &#8220;After Words,&#8221; acknowledgments, and a plug for The Missy Project. I think it&#8217;s unfair to an author and to the reader to write a review based on anything less [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Popularity of Christian Books</title>
		<link>http://www.edcottrell.com/2008/02/26/marketing-the-shack/#comment-43501</link>
		<dc:creator>EdBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Popularity of Christian Books</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edcottrell.com/2008/02/26/marketing-the-shack/#comment-43501</guid>
		<description>[...] P.S. Just because I included a book in this study does not, of course, mean that I think it&#8217;s a good book or one I recommend. P.P.S. For specific discussion of The Shack, see my posts here and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] P.S. Just because I included a book in this study does not, of course, mean that I think it&#8217;s a good book or one I recommend. P.P.S. For specific discussion of The Shack, see my posts here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
